From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 21:18:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 21:18:34 -0400 Received: from schmee.sfgoth.com ([63.205.85.133]:11534 "EHLO schmee.sfgoth.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 21:18:22 -0400 Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 18:18:30 -0700 From: Mitchell Blank Jr To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Renaud_Gu=E9rin?= Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.8 breaks ATM Message-ID: <20010812181830.B93564@sfgoth.com> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from rguerin@free.fr on Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 02:43:47PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Renaud Guérin wrote: > The following part of the 2.4.8 patch seems to be a typo (">>" looks more > logical than ">" if vci_bit is a bitfield), and broke ATM for me: Yes, the patch is 100% wrong and should be reverted. It had been sent to the ATM maintainers and was rejected, but someone else must have submitted it upstream since it magically appeared in the mainstream kernel. It's already been reverted in both 2.4.9pre1 and 2.4.8ac1. -Mitch