From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: poll change
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 02:16:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010815021648.G4304@athlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E15Wmp0-00056i-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> <20010814.154233.98555395.davem@redhat.com> <20010815020303.D4304@athlon.random> <20010814.170620.52165537.davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010814.170620.52165537.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 05:06:20PM -0700
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 05:06:20PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 02:03:03 +0200
>
> but OTOH the feedback I had was just happy with the 2.4 fix (so I didn't
> even checked if the 2.4 fix was fully compliant or not..).
>
> This is why I'm saying there is no practical reason to make
> this change.
Probably there isn't pratical reason agreed.
> The current code can actually improve performance, avoiding needlessly
> scanning fd==-1 entries.
you assume the entries above max_fds are set to -1, while strictly
speaking they don't need to.
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-15 0:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-14 21:08 RFC: poll change Tim Hockin
2001-08-14 21:43 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-14 22:38 ` Herbert Xu
2001-08-14 22:42 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-15 0:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-15 0:06 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-15 0:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2001-08-15 0:23 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-15 10:40 ` David Schwartz
2001-08-14 22:03 ` RFC: poll change - nevermind Tim Hockin
2001-08-14 22:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
[not found] <3B79B381.58266C13@sun.com>
[not found] ` <20010814.162710.131914269.davem@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <3B79B5F3.C816CBED@sun.com>
[not found] ` <20010814.163804.66057702.davem@redhat.com>
2001-08-14 23:53 ` RFC: poll change Tim Hockin
2001-08-14 23:53 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-15 0:08 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-15 0:09 ` Tim Hockin
2001-08-15 0:06 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-15 0:11 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-15 0:16 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-15 0:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-15 14:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-15 14:24 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-15 14:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-15 16:30 ` Hugh Dickins
2001-08-15 16:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010815021648.G4304@athlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox