From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolinux.com>
Cc: mauelshagen@sistina.com, Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>,
linux-lvm@sistina.com, lvm-devel@sistina.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
sistina@sistina.com, mge@sistina.com
Subject: Re: *** ANNOUNCEMENT *** LVM 1.0 available at www.sistina.com
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 23:13:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010815231330.B27003@athlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010815185005.A32239@sistina.com> <200108151755.f7FHtmTH013535@webber.adilger.int>
In-Reply-To: <200108151755.f7FHtmTH013535@webber.adilger.int>; from adilger@turbolinux.com on Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 11:55:48AM -0600
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 11:55:48AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Saying you "need" the old versions of the installed tools to read the
> on disk data is bogus, IMNSHO. You could easily have a flag which says
> "calculate the PE offsets using the old algorithm or the new algorithm".
Definitely. This is what I was asking for. That would be optimal.
> Also, since this bug exists only for a limited number of users (only a
> subset of users who created volumes with beta 5 and beta 6), it causes
> grief for anyone who is NOT affected by the bug.
Agreed. I understand that here I am biased but I don't care much about
that possible misalignment too because we never shipped a beta[56].
> Well, that is the future, and should not impact users of 2.4.x kernels.
> Just like we found an acceptable workaround to the (incompatible) IOP 11
> change (which was later reverted), it is possible to find an acceptable
> workaround for the new incompatible change. Sadly, it is no longer my
Agreed.
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-15 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-15 15:56 *** ANNOUNCEMENT *** LVM 1.0 available at www.sistina.com Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2001-08-15 16:25 ` Kurt Garloff
2001-08-15 16:50 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2001-08-15 17:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-15 20:06 ` [linux-lvm] " Joe Thornber
2001-08-15 20:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-15 20:20 ` [lvm-devel] " Christoph Hellwig
2001-08-15 21:19 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-08-15 17:19 ` Kurt Garloff
2001-08-15 17:55 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-08-15 20:13 ` [linux-lvm] " Joe Thornber
2001-08-15 21:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2001-08-15 19:14 ` Hubert Mantel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-08-15 17:17 Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2001-08-15 18:35 ` Todd M. Roy
2001-08-15 19:23 ` AJ Lewis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010815231330.B27003@athlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=adilger@turbolinux.com \
--cc=garloff@suse.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
--cc=lvm-devel@sistina.com \
--cc=mauelshagen@sistina.com \
--cc=mge@sistina.com \
--cc=sistina@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox