Re: 2.4.9 does not compile [PATCH]

Daniel Phillips
2001-08-16T23:07:37Z

On August 17, 2001 12:31 am, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: tpepper@vato.org
> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:41:09 -0700
>
> Confirmed here. Looks like a pretty obvious goof to me. Does the
following
> fix it for you?
>
> The args and semantics of min/max changed to take
> a type first argument,

They did? This three argument min is butt-ugly, not to mention a completely
original way of expressing the idea that is very much in conflict with every
other expression of min I have ever seen.

What is wrong with using typeof? If you must have a three argument min,
could it please be called "type_min" of similar.

> the problem with this ntfs file is that it fails to include linux/kernel.h

--
Daniel