From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 23:22:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 23:21:51 -0400 Received: from ns.caldera.de ([212.34.180.1]:52895 "EHLO ns.caldera.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 23:21:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 05:21:19 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Keith Owens Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: daddr_t is inconsistent and barely used Message-ID: <20010816052119.A28800@caldera.de> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Keith Owens , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200108160257.f7G2vYA18080@ns.caldera.de> <10589.997931660@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <10589.997931660@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com>; from kaos@ocs.com.au on Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 01:14:20PM +1000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 01:14:20PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote: > On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 04:57:34 +0200, > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >In article <9980.997929632@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> you wrote: > >> daddr_t is barely used in the kernel. 2.4.8. > >> > >> The use of daddr_t in freevxfs may give different in core and disk > >> layouts on different machines. Is that intended?. > > > >No, it may not. Please double check. > > That is why I said "may". It seemed puzzling that freevxfs used > vx_daddr_t for almost everything but daddr_t for a couple of fields. > An inconsistency with no obvious reason. vx_daddr_t is for disk structures, daddr_t for core.