From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 04:07:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 04:07:33 -0400 Received: from fe170.worldonline.dk ([212.54.64.199]:57098 "HELO fe170.worldonline.dk") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 04:07:25 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:10:07 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Hisaaki Shibata Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 4.7GB DVD-RAM geometry wrong? Message-ID: <20010816101007.T4352@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20010815233424P.shibata@luky.org> <20010816114439K.shibata@luky.org> <20010816085025.M4352@suse.de> <20010816165326B.shibata@luky.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010816165326B.shibata@luky.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 16 2001, Hisaaki Shibata wrote: > I got many warnings. but I dare send this. > > I hope it will be your help and mine. I don't have the -ac[5] tree handy, in the 2.4.9-pre4 there's no BUG in get_empty_inode(). For DVD-RAM + UDF, I would suggest using the version from CVS. I know it quite recently got some fixes that removed a BUG or two when used with the -ac kernels. So could you reproduce with latest -ac or Linus kernel + CVS UDF? Thanks. -- Jens Axboe