From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 08:57:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 08:57:00 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-meridian.redhat.com ([199.183.24.200]:55662 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 08:56:50 -0400 From: Alan Cox Message-Id: <200108161257.f7GCv1C32007@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Subject: Re: [patch] ips.c spin lock 64 bit issues To: root@chaos.analogic.com Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 08:57:01 -0400 (EDT) Cc: ipslinux@us.ibm.com (ServeRAID For Linux), jes@trained-monkey.org, alan@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com In-Reply-To: from "Richard B. Johnson" at Aug 16, 2001 08:48:43 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I don't think that "unsigned long" is the correct data type. Wrong. > Isn't there a data type that means "the largest unsigned integer type > that fits into a register on the target..."? I was told that that's what But we don't care. The flags is defined as unsigned long.