From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:01:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:01:05 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:31104 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:00:57 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 14:58:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20010817.145837.122620550.davem@redhat.com> To: riel@conectiva.com.br Cc: aia21@cam.ac.uk, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, phillips@bonn-fries.net, tpepper@vato.org, f5ibh@db0bm.ampr.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.9 does not compile [PATCH] From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <20010816.164027.85686335.davem@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.0 on Emacs 21.0 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Rik van Riel Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:44:16 -0300 (BRST) On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, David S. Miller wrote: > Linus will reject every such patch, and I have grepping scripts > that will detect crap like this entering the tree in case he > misses something. Well, you're not the NTFS maintainer. Yes, but Linus is the kernel maintainer. Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com