From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolabs.com>
To: "Mark H. Wood" <mwood@IUPUI.Edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext2 not NULLing deleted files?
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 14:09:43 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010817140831.H17372@turbolinux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010817020241.C32617@turbolinux.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108171243410.392-100000@mhw.ULib.IUPUI.Edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108171243410.392-100000@mhw.ULib.IUPUI.Edu>
On Aug 17, 2001 12:55 -0500, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> Regarding the need to do more than just zero unwanted data, I note that
> there is a U.S. DOD MIL-SPEC (no, I do not know the number) which defines
> a sequence of patterns to be used for erasing magnetic media.
In the Usenix paper quoted earlier in this thread (I believe) it was
stated that the MIL-SPEC document was actually bogus. REAL secure
deletion requirements were much more strict (something like 15 passes of
various random and non-random patterns vs. 7 passes of alternating all 0
and all 1 data), but the US government made it think that the MIL-SPEC
requirements were enough, so that naive users would follow it, still
leaving enough trace data on the disk for the government to retrieve it.
Still, even a single pass of zero writes is enough to prevent 99.9%
of attackers from getting the data back.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto,
\ would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?"
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ -- Dogbert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-17 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-17 7:38 ext2 not NULLing deleted files? Enver Haase
2001-08-17 7:47 ` Robert Love
2001-08-17 17:40 ` Mark H. Wood
2001-08-17 7:56 ` Thomas Pornin
2001-08-17 8:02 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-08-17 17:55 ` Mark H. Wood
2001-08-17 20:09 ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2001-08-21 14:19 ` Andreas Bombe
2001-08-17 16:32 ` Marc SCHAEFER
2001-08-17 17:25 ` Andreas Dilger
[not found] <01081709381000.08800@haneman.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2001-08-17 8:03 ` Andi Kleen
2001-08-17 14:20 ` Kent Borg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-08-17 22:05 Jesse Pollard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010817140831.H17372@turbolinux.com \
--to=adilger@turbolabs.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mwood@IUPUI.Edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox