public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrzej Krzysztofowicz <kufel!ankry@green.mif.pg.gda.pl>
To: kufel!thyrsus.com!esr@green.mif.pg.gda.pl
Cc: kufel!vger.kernel.org!linux-kernel@green.mif.pg.gda.pl (Linux
	Kernel List),
	kufel!lanm-pc.com!gars@green.mif.pg.gda.pl
Subject: Re: Swap size for a machine with 2GB of memory
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 10:25:36 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200108190825.KAA00983@kufel.dom> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010819024233.A26916@thyrsus.com> from "Eric S. Raymond" at sie 19, 2001 02:42:33

> 
> The Red Hat installation manual claims that the size of the swap partition
> should be twice the size of physical memory, but no more than 128MB.

This manual is outdated. 

1. You hahe 2GB limit for a single swap file/partition now. And you can use
   many of them.
2. it sjould be <= 2* RAM, i.e. 0 <= SWAP <= 2*RAM. More is inefficient.
3. except kernels 2.4.x, where x <= 7-ac8, where you should have SWAP=0 or
   SWAP > RAM. 2.4.7-ac9 & 2.4.8 have already this problem fixed.

> The screaming hotrod machine Gary Sandine and I built around the Tyan S2464
> has 2GB of physical memory.  Should I believe the above formula?  If not,
> is there a more correct one for calculating needed swap on machines with
> very large memory?

Correct and universal formula for swap size is as always:
   SWAP = MAX_RAM_you_ever_need - physical_RAM_you_have

However in 2.4 more eficient (and in 2.40-7 obligatory) is:
   SWAP = MAX_RAM_you_ever_need > physical_RAM_you_have
          ? MAX_RAM_you_ever_need
;)

Andrzej

  reply	other threads:[~2001-08-19 19:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-08-19  6:42 Swap size for a machine with 2GB of memory Eric S. Raymond
2001-08-19  8:25 ` Andrzej Krzysztofowicz [this message]
2001-08-19  9:46 ` Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
2001-08-19 16:15   ` Ingo Oeser
2001-08-19 14:08 ` Alan Cox
2001-08-19 16:48   ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-08-19 14:39 ` Steven Cole
2001-08-19 17:29 ` Luigi Genoni
2001-08-19 15:52   ` Steven Cole
2001-08-19 22:16     ` Luigi Genoni
2001-08-19 20:49 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-08-19 21:15   ` Eric S. Raymond
2001-08-20  0:05   ` Kevin Krieser
2001-08-20 17:42     ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-08-20 23:09       ` Kevin Krieser
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-08-20  0:08 Andries.Brouwer
2001-08-21 23:14 ` Kurt Garloff
2001-08-24 12:45 ` Rogier Wolff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200108190825.KAA00983@kufel.dom \
    --to=kufel!ankry@green.mif.pg.gda.pl \
    --cc=kufel!lanm-pc.com!gars@green.mif.pg.gda.pl \
    --cc=kufel!thyrsus.com!esr@green.mif.pg.gda.pl \
    --cc=kufel!vger.kernel.org!linux-kernel@green.mif.pg.gda.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox