From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 14:40:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 14:40:27 -0400 Received: from smtp.mailbox.co.uk ([195.82.125.32]:31412 "EHLO smtp.mailbox.net.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 14:40:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 19:40:35 +0100 From: Russell King To: george anzinger Cc: Victor Yodaiken , =?iso-8859-1?Q?christophe_barb=E9?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: How should nano_sleep be fixed (was: ptrace(), fork(), sleep(), exit(), SIGCHLD) Message-ID: <20010822194035.K18391@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20010817125727.A16475@hq2> <3B7D76EF.DA34EB23@mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B7D76EF.DA34EB23@mvista.com>; from george@mvista.com on Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 12:56:31PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 12:56:31PM -0700, george anzinger wrote: > Uh..? I though that was what I was allowing. It seems to me to be a > lot of extra work to put the same code in 15 different archs. > Especially if one does not really know each of them, nor can any one > group (or individual) be expected to be able to test (or even have the > hardware to test) each of them. Umm, my best advice is to look at sys_fork() and do_fork(), sys_execve() and do_execve(). -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html