From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:55:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:55:23 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-meridian.redhat.com ([199.183.24.200]:24148 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:55:10 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:55:26 -0400 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Paul Clements Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: gcc bug causing problem in kernel builds Message-ID: <20010823165526.F4385@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek In-Reply-To: <3B855C19.7A4233BF@SteelEye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B855C19.7A4233BF@SteelEye.com>; from Paul.Clements@SteelEye.com on Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 03:40:09PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 03:40:09PM -0400, Paul Clements wrote: > Does anyone know if the structure misalignment problem in gcc 2.96 is a > known issue? (could this bug be induced by a RedHat-applied gcc patch, > if there are any) There are some patches applied (something like ~350 patches), but as gcc 3.0.1 and gcc CVS head behave the same way as gcc-2.96-RH, it is not RH specific. Looking into it. Jakub