From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 23:26:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 23:26:35 -0400 Received: from hq.fsmlabs.com ([209.155.42.197]:11794 "EHLO hq.fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 23:26:23 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 21:22:49 -0600 From: Cort Dougan To: Alan Cox Cc: "Grover, Andrew" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" Subject: Re: source control? Message-ID: <20010823212249.N498@ftsoj.fsmlabs.com> In-Reply-To: <4148FEAAD879D311AC5700A0C969E89006CDE0A4@orsmsx35.jf.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 12:28:09AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org That's a great description of all source control! "Makes it all to easy for other people to push crap into your tree"! There is great benefit to making it very hard for people to get changes into a tree. It forces people to ask "Is this really worth all the effort?" several times. It's a great filter. } It does. Or at least many of the development teams do. That doesn't mean a } general CVS is a good idea. CVS make it all to easy for other people to } push crap into your tree.