From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:17:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:17:41 -0400 Received: from willow.seitz.com ([207.106.55.140]:60944 "EHLO willow.seitz.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:17:31 -0400 From: Ross Vandegrift Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:17:47 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4 broken on 486SX Message-ID: <20010824161747.A10618@willow.seitz.com> In-Reply-To: <20010824154233.A10048@willow.seitz.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010824154233.A10048@willow.seitz.com>; from ross@willow.seitz.com on Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 03:42:33PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ack, that was a horrific problem report. Here are a few relevant data points I left out: Kernels have always been compiled only with 386 optimizations. (tried 486 a few times, no difference) Always built including soft float support (not that it matters so early) Always built with gcc 2.95.2 Same kernel binaries work perfectly on a number of other boxen: A 386DX, a number of Pentium 100's, another 486SX, and a K6-2 Ross Vandegrift ross@willow.seitz.com