public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cliff Albert <cliff@oisec.net>
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nigel@nrg.org
Subject: Re: Updated Linux kernel preemption patches
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 09:38:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010827093835.A15153@oisec.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <998877465.801.19.camel@phantasy>
In-Reply-To: <998877465.801.19.camel@phantasy>

On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 09:57:43PM -0400, Robert Love wrote:

> Available at:
> 
> http://tech9.net/rml/linux/patch-rml-2.4.9-preempt-kernel-1
> http://tech9.net/rml/linux/patch-rml-2.4.8-ac12-preempt-kernel-1
> 
> for kernel 2.4.9 and 2.4.8-ac12, respectively.
> 
> This is a straight update of Nigel Gamble's Linux kernel preemption
> patch from http://kpreempt.sourceforge.net, updated for the above
> kernels.  Thus, this is Nigel's code -- I merely updated it.
> 
> I am eager to see work done on the patch and to see what its future may
> be.  If you are in any way interested in application latency or
> real-time support, I suggest you check this out.  If you are just
> curious, its an interesting patch none-the-less.

Kernel won't compile when this patch is applied to 2.4.8-ac12

kernel/kernel.o: In function `mmput':
kernel/kernel.o(.text+0x1853): undefined reference to `atomic_dec_and_lock'
kernel/kernel.o: In function `free_uid':
kernel/kernel.o(.text+0xaea0): undefined reference to `atomic_dec_and_lock'
fs/fs.o: In function `kill_super':
fs/fs.o(.text+0x7002): undefined reference to `atomic_dec_and_lock'
fs/fs.o: In function `dput':
fs/fs.o(.text+0x13365): undefined reference to `atomic_dec_and_lock'
fs/fs.o: In function `iput':
fs/fs.o(.text+0x15ed2): undefined reference to `atomic_dec_and_lock'


-- 
Cliff Albert		| RIPE:	     CA3348-RIPE | www.oisec.net
cliff@oisec.net		| 6BONE:     CA2-6BONE	 | icq 18461740

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-08-27  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-08-27  1:57 Updated Linux kernel preemption patches Robert Love
2001-08-27  3:06 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-08-27  3:09   ` Robert Love
2001-08-27  7:38 ` Cliff Albert [this message]
2001-08-27 13:46   ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 15:20     ` Cliff Albert
2001-08-27 19:31   ` J Sloan
2001-08-27 19:44     ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 21:12       ` Andrey Nekrasov
2001-08-27 21:35         ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 21:18       ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 21:24         ` Cliff Albert
2001-08-27 21:40           ` Robert Love
2001-08-27 23:06             ` Andrey Nekrasov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010827093835.A15153@oisec.net \
    --to=cliff@oisec.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nigel@nrg.org \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox