From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 23:26:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 23:26:29 -0400 Received: from codepoet.org ([166.70.14.212]:9810 "HELO winder.codepoet.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 23:26:19 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:26:40 -0600 From: Erik Andersen To: "Jeff V. Merkey" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Novell Attacks Linux Message-ID: <20010829212640.A4268@codepoet.org> Reply-To: andersen@codepoet.org Mail-Followup-To: Erik Andersen , "Jeff V. Merkey" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20010825020114.A12724@vger.timpanogas.org> <3B8809A5.DB7B6764@baywinds.org> <20010825153009.B14524@vger.timpanogas.org> <9mcurg$cuo$1@forge.intermeta.de> <20010827122838.A20599@vger.timpanogas.org> <9mfka8$sb$1@forge.intermeta.de> <20010829210356.B29267@vger.timpanogas.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010829210356.B29267@vger.timpanogas.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.8-ac10-rmk1-rmk2, Rebel-NetWinder(Intel sa110 rev 3), 262.14 BogoMips X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed Aug 29, 2001 at 09:03:56PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > state, depending on the circumstances. You are allowed to have multiple > wives, and the State will support all of them for you with child support > so long as they are older than 16. If you are a Mormon, you get to tell > these wives they will not be allowed in heaven unless they do whatever > you tell them. Thank you for your ideas. But lets be clear here, they are _your_ ideas and have as little to do with fact as your legal problems with Novell have to do with Linux. Quoting from the Utah State Consitution: http://www.le.state.ut.us/~code/const/htm/co_17003.htm "An Act to punish polygamy and other kindred offenses," approved February 4th, A.D. 1892, in so far as the same defines and imposes penalties for polygamy, is hereby declared to be in force in the State of Utah. There was even a very recent case where a polygamist was charged and convicted. I suggest you take a look: http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/05/19/utah.polygamy/ -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen email: andersee@debian.org --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--