public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Jonathan Lahr <lahr@us.ibm.com>
Cc: lahr@beaverton.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: io_request_lock/queue_lock patch
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 20:03:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010831200333.A9069@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010830134930.F23680@us.ibm.com> <20010831075613.A2855@suse.de> <20010831075201.N23680@us.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010831075201.N23680@us.ibm.com>; from lahr@us.ibm.com on Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 07:52:01AM -0700

On Fri, Aug 31 2001, Jonathan Lahr wrote:
> 
> Jens,
> 
> Please elaborate on "no, no, no".   Are you suggesting that no further
> improvements can be made or should be attempted on the 2.4 i/o subsystem?

Of course not. The no no no just means that attempting to globally remove the
io_request_lock at this point is a no-go, so don't even go there. The
sledgehammer approach will not fly at this point, it's just way too risky.

Jens

  reply	other threads:[~2001-08-31 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-08-30 20:49 io_request_lock/queue_lock patch Jonathan Lahr
2001-08-30 21:32 ` Gérard Roudier
2001-08-30 21:47   ` Eric Youngdale
2001-08-30 23:07     ` Jonathan Lahr
2001-08-31  5:57       ` Jens Axboe
2001-08-31  5:56 ` Jens Axboe
2001-08-31 14:52   ` Jonathan Lahr
2001-08-31 18:03     ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2001-08-31 18:33       ` Jonathan Lahr
2001-09-03  7:07         ` Jens Axboe
2001-09-04 16:46           ` Jonathan Lahr
2001-09-04 17:17             ` Jens Axboe
2001-09-05 20:30           ` Peter Rival
2001-09-06  6:03             ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010831200333.A9069@suse.de \
    --to=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=lahr@beaverton.ibm.com \
    --cc=lahr@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox