From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 14:55:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 14:55:13 -0400 Received: from ns.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.10]:54287 "HELO heather.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 14:55:05 -0400 Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 20:54:01 +0200 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: Mike Galbraith Cc: linux-kernel Subject: Re: Memory Problem in 2.4.10-pre2 / __alloc_pages failed Message-Id: <20010901205401.158577a1.skraw@ithnet.com> In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <20010901055634Z16057-32383+2785@humbolt.nl.linux.org> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 1 Sep 2001 10:26:48 +0200 (CEST) Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sat, 1 Sep 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > Better go back and read the thread. The allocation rate is definitely > > limited - he's doing a cd burn and some network copies. [....] > ^^^^^^^ > P.S. > Stephan: try unconditionally doing gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_WAIT at the top > of page_launder(). I think that will help your problem some. Hi Mike, I tried, doesn't make a difference. Same number of alloc-fails. Sorry. Patch looks weird anyway :-) Regards, Stephan