From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:41:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:41:36 -0400 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:6898 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:41:22 -0400 Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 09:41:37 -0700 From: Mike Fedyk To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [OFFTOPIC] Secure network fileserving Linux <-> Linux Message-ID: <20010906094137.E29607@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <200109061228.HAA31597@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200109061228.HAA31597@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 07:28:59AM -0500, Jesse Pollard wrote: > > The 802.11x standard(s) implement this for wireless networks, it can also > > be used on wired networks (the specs allow it at least). > > I wouldn't want to use 802.11 for much of anything where security is important. > It's just too easy to crack. You also need good physical and OS security > to implement VPNs over wireless. That would be 802.11 over a wired network, not wireless....