From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: _deepfire@mail.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
marcelo@conectiva.com.br
Subject: Re: page pre-swapping + moving it on cache-list
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 14:51:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010906145152.5b229174.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0109060828420.31200-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>
In-Reply-To: <200109060519.f865Ja106488@vegae.deep.net> <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0109060828420.31200-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva>
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 08:29:03 -0300 (BRST) Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Samium Gromoff wrote:
>
> > Here is an idea i think i stole from Matthew Dillon`s paper.
> >
> > Actually it sound more like we take some pages from the near 0
> > age and swapping them out but not throwing them away, but moving them
> > from active list to cache. So that we can always throw them away
> > at near null cost while shrinking the cache. This is like a
> > replacement for swap-cache if i`m right here...
>
> This is called the "inactive_clean" list in Linux terminology. ;)
What's the use of an inactive_clean list anyway, or the effective difference
between its members and the members of memfree (I suspect such a list from the
output of /proc/meminfo)?
Besides the fact, that the splitting in two lists prevents proper
defragmentation (if you have pages in two lists you are not driven to defrag at
the point where you put them together in one).
Regards,
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-06 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-06 5:19 page pre-swapping + moving it on cache-list Samium Gromoff
2001-09-06 11:29 ` Rik van Riel
2001-09-06 12:51 ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2001-09-06 13:05 ` Rik van Riel
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0109061003320.31200-100000@imladris.rielhome.con ectiva>
2001-09-06 13:21 ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-09-06 14:47 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-09-07 10:15 ` Helge Hafting
2001-09-07 10:35 ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010906145152.5b229174.skraw@ithnet.com \
--to=skraw@ithnet.com \
--cc=_deepfire@mail.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox