From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 08:30:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 08:30:27 -0400 Received: from ns.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.10]:11790 "HELO heather.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 08:30:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 14:30:21 +0200 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: Daniel Phillips Cc: riel@conectiva.com.br, jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu, marcelo@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue Message-Id: <20010907143021.3cefbf74.skraw@ithnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20010906174422Z16127-26184+6@humbolt.nl.linux.org> In-Reply-To: <20010906122459Z16031-32383+3771@humbolt.nl.linux.org> <20010906151015.69d2afb2.skraw@ithnet.com> <20010906174422Z16127-26184+6@humbolt.nl.linux.org> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 19:51:26 +0200 Daniel Phillips wrote: > On September 6, 2001 03:10 pm, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > [...] > > to lots on the nfs-data. Even if the nfs-data would only have one single hit, > > the old CD image should have been removed, because it is inactive and _older_. > > OK, this is not related to what we were discussing (IO latency). It's not too > hard to fix, we just need to do a little aging whenever there are allocations, > whether or not there is memory_pressure. I don't think it's a real problem > though, we have at least two problems we really do need to fix (oom and > high order failures). Hm, I am not quite sure about that. Can you _show_ me how to fix this? Regards, Stephan