From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 00:14:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 00:14:48 -0400 Received: from [209.250.53.26] ([209.250.53.26]:16907 "EHLO hapablap.dyn.dhs.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 00:14:38 -0400 Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 23:14:39 -0500 From: Steven Walter To: Josh McKinney Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.10-pre5 Message-ID: <20010908231439.A21738@hapablap.dyn.dhs.org> Mail-Followup-To: Steven Walter , Josh McKinney , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3B9A95C7.DDF81890@oracle.com> <20010908230539.A4927@home.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010908230539.A4927@home.com>; from forming@home.com on Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 11:05:39PM -0500 X-Uptime: 11:13pm up 2 days, 4:09, 0 users, load average: 1.11, 1.08, 1.02 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I've used it several times. I thought that I experienced a compiler bug at one point, but then I found that the same behavior occurs with 2.95.3, so... On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 11:05:39PM -0500, Josh McKinney wrote: > Since I have gotten a decent amount of flame mail from my one-liner posted > yesterday, I am just curious. Has anyone really been able to successfully > compile their kernel with gcc-3*. I did once or twice long before it was > released, but it dies on the same error everytime. I posted it to the > GCC mailing list because it was an internal compiler error, but it went > unanswered, along with other reports of the same bug. Anyway, I just want > to see if someone really is able to use it as a reliable compiler. > > Josh -- -Steven In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. -- George Orwell Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. War is peace. -- George Orwell