From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 11:59:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 11:59:40 -0400 Received: from codepoet.org ([166.70.14.212]:63543 "HELO winder.codepoet.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 11:59:24 -0400 Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 09:59:45 -0600 From: Erik Andersen To: Shiva Raman Pandey Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Query about Tun/Tap Modules Message-ID: <20010909095945.A2253@codepoet.org> Reply-To: andersen@codepoet.org Mail-Followup-To: Erik Andersen , Shiva Raman Pandey , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <9ng1q4$or1$1@ncc-z.sasken.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9ng1q4$or1$1@ncc-z.sasken.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.8-ac10-rmk1-rmk2, Rebel-NetWinder(Intel sa110 rev 3), 262.14 BogoMips X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun Sep 09, 2001 at 08:58:56PM +0530, Shiva Raman Pandey wrote: > > Q2. What can be other ways, not very complicated to solve my purpose > instead of using Tun/Tap. The network block device can be used via loopback... -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen email: andersee@debian.org --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--