From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 13:30:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 13:30:29 -0400 Received: from penguin.e-mind.com ([195.223.140.120]:17216 "EHLO penguin.e-mind.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 13:30:11 -0400 Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 19:30:51 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Alan Cox Cc: Linus Torvalds , Manfred Spraul , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Purpose of the mm/slab.c changes Message-ID: <20010909193051.X11329@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 05:47:12PM +0100 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 05:47:12PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > doesn't matter which free page is used first/last. > > > > You're full of crap. > > LIFO is obviously superior due to cache re-use. > > Interersting question however. On SMP without sufficient per CPU slab caches > is tht still the case ? if we stay in per-cpu caches then the other paths cannot run at all so it cannot make any difference for such case. Andrea