From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 13:34:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 13:34:40 -0400 Received: from penguin.e-mind.com ([195.223.140.120]:23872 "EHLO penguin.e-mind.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 13:34:31 -0400 Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 19:35:13 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Alan Cox , Manfred Spraul , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Purpose of the mm/slab.c changes Message-ID: <20010909193513.Y11329@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from torvalds@transmeta.com on Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 10:01:32AM -0700 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 10:01:32AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > (Doing per-CPU LIFO queues for the actual page allocator would potentially > make page alloc/de-alloc much faster due to lower locking requirements > too. So you might have a double performance win if anybody wants to try > this out). I recall I seen this one implemented during some auditing recently, I think it's in the tux patch but I may remeber wrong. Andrea