From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:20:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:20:31 -0400 Received: from are.twiddle.net ([64.81.246.98]:33930 "EHLO are.twiddle.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:20:20 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 17:19:33 -0700 From: Richard Henderson To: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: 2.4.10-pre6 fd_install BUG Message-ID: <20010910171933.A5663@twiddle.net> Mail-Followup-To: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I've just gotten 3 of these while building gcc (UP ev67): kernel BUG at /home/rth/work/linux/linux/include/linux/file.h:93! sh(19121): Kernel Bug 1 [Oops report] Call trace: fffffc000085421c do_pipe+2ac fffffc000081313c sys_pipe Given that we've called get_unused_fd, it seems highly suspect that we'd have a descriptor installed already. Is anyone else seeing this, or should I start looking for compiler bugs? r~