From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 05:34:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 05:34:31 -0400 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.101]:18894 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 05:34:16 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 15:09:46 +0530 From: Maneesh Soni To: andrea@suse.de Cc: LKML Subject: Re: 2.4.10pre7aa1 Message-ID: <20010911150946.A14621@sequent.com> Reply-To: smaneesh@sequent.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article <20010910200344.C714@athlon.random> you wrote: > Long term of course, but with my further changes before the inclusion > the plain current patches shouldn't apply any longer, I'd like if the > developers of the current rcu fd patches could check my changes and > adapt them (if they agree with my changes of course ;). Hello Andrea, I have noted your changes and I am modifying the FD patch accordingly. In fact in the first version of FD patch I have used the rc_callback() interface which equivalent to call_rcu(). Regards, Maneesh -- Maneesh Soni IBM Linux Technology Center, IBM India Software Lab, Bangalore. Phone: +91-80-5262355 Extn. 3999 email: smaneesh@sequent.com http://lse.sourceforge.net/locking/rclock.html