Re: 2.4.10pre7aa1

[Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>]

In article <20010911131238.N715@athlon.random> you wrote:
> many thanks. At the moment my biggest concern is about the need of
> call_rcu not to be starved by RT threads (keventd can be starved so then
> it won't matter if krcud is RT because we won't start using it).

> Andrea

I think we can avoid keventd altogether by using a periodic timer (say 10ms)
to check for completion of an RC update. The timer may be active
only if only if there is any RCU going on in the system - that way
we still don't have any impact on the rest of the kernel.

I am working on such a thing - but it will take me a little bit
of time to figure out how to do this in linux.

Thanks
Dipankar
-- 
Dipankar Sarma  <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Project: http://lse.sourceforge.net
Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Lab, Bangalore, India.