From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 21:47:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 21:47:41 -0400 Received: from [208.48.139.185] ([208.48.139.185]:2944 "HELO forty.greenhydrant.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 21:47:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 18:47:47 -0700 From: David Rees To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ext3-2.4-0.9.9 Message-ID: <20010912184747.A883@greenhydrant.com> Mail-Followup-To: David Rees , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3B991346.7393E7AF@zip.com.au> <20010908045952.P7672@emma1.emma.line.org> <999921805.903.6.camel@phantasy> <20010912183949.G25683@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010912183949.G25683@mikef-linux.matchmail.com>; from mfedyk@matchmail.com on Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 06:39:49PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 06:39:49PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote: > On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 12:03:24AM -0400, Robert Love wrote: > > I went ahead and rediffed ext3-0.9.9 against 2.4.9-ac10. Find it > > attached (65k, 17k gzipped). > > > > Ted's ext3 directory speedup still applies cleanly, of course. > > > > Still using ext3-0.9.9 + dir speed up, now on ac10, with no problems. > > > > Can someone point me to that dir speed up patch? I've looked on kernel > newbies for Tso's page, google searches found old dev archives for ext2, and > a patch against 2.4.4 for directory indexing.... > > Is there anything I should know before trying this? You can download it at the ext3 for 2.4 page: http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ Only thing you should know is that it hasn't been that heavily tested on ext3. -Dave