From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:20:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:20:29 -0400 Received: from app79.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE ([137.226.181.79]:36626 "EHLO anduin.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:20:12 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 14:19:38 +0200 From: Jan Niehusmann To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: VDA , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Stomping on Athlon bug Message-ID: <20010913141937.A1873@gondor.com> In-Reply-To: <17613305632.20010913121304@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> <3BA087CA.3BD1D557@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BA087CA.3BD1D557@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:17:46AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > Interesting; This is exactly the bit that the athlon cool thingy that > popped up > here a while ago changed; everybody agreed that it was WAAAAY too > dangerous > back then, because PSU's and voltage regulators wouldn't be able to > cope...... But, as far as I understand, STPGNT will not be enabled unless ACPI power saving is in use, so setting the disconnect on STPGNT bit should not matter. Jan