From: Val Henson <val@nmt.edu>
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>,
jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com, becker@scyld.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Endian-ness bugs in yellowfin.c
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 00:12:03 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010914001201.A2951@boardwalk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010913195141.B799@boardwalk> <20010913193937.O21906@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> <20010913205459.A1169@boardwalk> <20010913200237.P21906@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> <20010913220118.A647@one-eyed-alien.net>
In-Reply-To: <20010913220118.A647@one-eyed-alien.net>; from mdharm-kernel@one-eyed-alien.net on Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 10:01:18PM -0700
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 10:01:18PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> I would agree that listing them under the highest capable is probably the
> best. It is, at least, consistent with the 10/100 cards.
I'm interested to hear why you think this is better than listing the
card under both of the 100 and 1000 Mbit categories (as the patch I
sent does it). Also, we are not talking about one 10/100/1000 card,
we are talking about one driver that supports two separate cards, one
10/100/1000 and one 10/100.
-VAL
> Also, people will pick up the card, think "gigabit ethernet", and then look
> under the 1000 section. I don't think anyone will really think GigE and
> then look under 10/100.
>
> The Intel 82543 and 82544 gigabit parts are all 10/100/1000 -- I'll be
> writing a driver for those in a few weeks if nobody beats me to it, so I
> think it would be good to settle this.
>
> Matt
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 08:02:37PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 08:55:01PM -0600, Val Henson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 07:39:37PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 07:51:41PM -0600, Val Henson wrote:
> > > > > - tristate ' Symbios 53c885 (Synergy ethernet) support' CONFIG_NCR885E
> > > > > + tristate ' Symbios 53c885 (Synergy ethernet) support' CONFIG_YELLOWFIN
> > > >
> > > > Since you're killing this, why not just remove this question entirely?
> > >
> > > This is one of the "design decisions" I referred to. It makes no
> > > sense to list a 100 Mbit driver under "Ethernet (1000 Mbit)". This is
> > > my solution. This is the first case of a dual 1000/100 Mbit driver
> > > and if there's a better way to handle it I'd like to hear it.
> >
> > Er, sungem does 10/100/1000 too I think.. (It's what's in the new G4
> > towers..). IMHO, listing it once under the greatest makes sense. But
> > sungem/gmac are under 10/100 I think.
> >
> > --
> > Tom Rini (TR1265)
> > http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
> --
> Matthew Dharm Home: mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net
> Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver
>
> C: They kicked your ass, didn't they?
> S: They were cheating!
> -- The Chief and Stef
> User Friendly, 11/19/1997
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-14 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-14 1:51 [PATCH] Endian-ness bugs in yellowfin.c Val Henson
2001-09-14 2:39 ` Tom Rini
2001-09-14 2:55 ` Val Henson
2001-09-14 3:02 ` Tom Rini
2001-09-14 5:01 ` Matthew Dharm
2001-09-14 6:12 ` Val Henson [this message]
2001-09-14 9:12 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-14 6:15 ` Val Henson
2001-09-14 6:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-09-14 8:07 ` Kai Henningsen
2001-09-14 20:20 ` Val Henson
2001-09-14 6:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-09-14 18:50 ` Cort Dougan
2001-09-14 20:20 ` Val Henson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010914001201.A2951@boardwalk \
--to=val@nmt.edu \
--cc=becker@scyld.com \
--cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox