From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 02:25:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 02:25:01 -0400 Received: from mailhost.nmt.edu ([129.138.4.52]:27658 "EHLO mailhost.nmt.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 02:24:54 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 00:12:03 -0600 From: Val Henson To: Tom Rini , jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com, becker@scyld.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Endian-ness bugs in yellowfin.c Message-ID: <20010914001201.A2951@boardwalk> In-Reply-To: <20010913195141.B799@boardwalk> <20010913193937.O21906@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> <20010913205459.A1169@boardwalk> <20010913200237.P21906@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> <20010913220118.A647@one-eyed-alien.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010913220118.A647@one-eyed-alien.net>; from mdharm-kernel@one-eyed-alien.net on Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 10:01:18PM -0700 Favorite-Color: Polka dot Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 10:01:18PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote: > I would agree that listing them under the highest capable is probably the > best. It is, at least, consistent with the 10/100 cards. I'm interested to hear why you think this is better than listing the card under both of the 100 and 1000 Mbit categories (as the patch I sent does it). Also, we are not talking about one 10/100/1000 card, we are talking about one driver that supports two separate cards, one 10/100/1000 and one 10/100. -VAL > Also, people will pick up the card, think "gigabit ethernet", and then look > under the 1000 section. I don't think anyone will really think GigE and > then look under 10/100. > > The Intel 82543 and 82544 gigabit parts are all 10/100/1000 -- I'll be > writing a driver for those in a few weeks if nobody beats me to it, so I > think it would be good to settle this. > > Matt > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 08:02:37PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 08:55:01PM -0600, Val Henson wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 07:39:37PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 07:51:41PM -0600, Val Henson wrote: > > > > > - tristate ' Symbios 53c885 (Synergy ethernet) support' CONFIG_NCR885E > > > > > + tristate ' Symbios 53c885 (Synergy ethernet) support' CONFIG_YELLOWFIN > > > > > > > > Since you're killing this, why not just remove this question entirely? > > > > > > This is one of the "design decisions" I referred to. It makes no > > > sense to list a 100 Mbit driver under "Ethernet (1000 Mbit)". This is > > > my solution. This is the first case of a dual 1000/100 Mbit driver > > > and if there's a better way to handle it I'd like to hear it. > > > > Er, sungem does 10/100/1000 too I think.. (It's what's in the new G4 > > towers..). IMHO, listing it once under the greatest makes sense. But > > sungem/gmac are under 10/100 I think. > > > > -- > > Tom Rini (TR1265) > > http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ > > - > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > -- > Matthew Dharm Home: mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net > Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver > > C: They kicked your ass, didn't they? > S: They were cheating! > -- The Chief and Stef > User Friendly, 11/19/1997