From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Define conflict between ext3 and raid patches against 2.2.19
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 15:58:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010916155835.C24067@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
I'm trying to setup a 2.2 kernel that I can use for comparison to the latest
2.4 kernels I've been testing, but I came accross a little problem with the
patches I've been trying to combine.
I've already applied:
ide.2.2.19.05042001.patch
linux-2.2.19.kdb.diff
linux-2.2.19.ext3.diff
And now I'm trying to apply raid-2.2.19-A1, and I get one reject in
include/linux/fs.h.
***************
*** 191,197 ****
#define BH_Req 3 /* 0 if the buffer has been invalidated */
#define BH_Protected 6 /* 1 if the buffer is protected */
#define BH_Wait_IO 7 /* 1 if we should throttle on this buffer */
/*
* Try to keep the most commonly used fields in single cache lines (16
--- 191,196 ----
#define BH_Req 3 /* 0 if the buffer has been invalidated */
#define BH_Protected 6 /* 1 if the buffer is protected */
#define BH_Wait_IO 7 /* 1 if we should throttle on this buffer */
+ #define BH_LowPrio 8 /* 1 if the buffer is lowprio */
/*
* Try to keep the most commonly used fields in single cache lines (16
Now I have two defines from different patches for the same bit. The top
line is from RAID, and bottom is of ext3 origin.
#define BH_LowPrio 8 /* 1 if the buffer is lowprio */
#define BH_Temp 8 /* 1 if the buffer is temporary (unlinked)
Is this a fatal conflict? How can I resolve this?
Mike
next reply other threads:[~2001-09-16 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-16 22:58 Mike Fedyk [this message]
2001-09-16 23:09 ` Define conflict between ext3 and raid patches against 2.2.19 Lehmann
2001-09-17 1:43 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-17 4:42 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-09-18 11:08 ` Neil Brown
2001-09-18 19:24 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-19 20:38 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-19 22:35 ` Neil Brown
2001-09-21 13:10 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-09-21 22:44 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-01 21:17 ` Hans Reiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010916155835.C24067@mikef-linux.matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox