From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Define conflict between ext3 and raid patches against 2.2.19
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 12:24:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010918122422.B6861@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010916155835.C24067@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> <15271.11056.810538.66237@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au>
In-Reply-To: <15271.11056.810538.66237@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au>
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 09:08:32PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Sunday September 16, mfedyk@matchmail.com wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to setup a 2.2 kernel that I can use for comparison to the latest
> > 2.4 kernels I've been testing, but I came accross a little problem with the
> > patches I've been trying to combine.
> >
> > I've already applied:
> > ide.2.2.19.05042001.patch
> > linux-2.2.19.kdb.diff
> > linux-2.2.19.ext3.diff
> >
> > And now I'm trying to apply raid-2.2.19-A1, and I get one reject in
> > include/linux/fs.h.
>
> You should be aware that ext3 (and other journalling filesystems) do
> not work reliably over RAID1 or RAID5 in 2.2. Inparticular, you can
> get problems when the array is rebuilding/resyncing.
>
> But if you only plan to use ext3 with raid0 or linear, you should be
> fine.
>
Crap.
I was just about to test ext3 on a raid1 with 2.2.20pre. Everything else
I've tried has worked great.
As it looks, this probably won't be fixed in 2.2, especially since the raid
patch won't be merged into 2.2 (as stated by Alan).
I'll just have to test 2.4 harder now. 2.4.x-ac has been pretty good
concerning swap usage, and performance on my workstations. I hope 2.4.10
will merge those improvements.
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-18 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-16 22:58 Define conflict between ext3 and raid patches against 2.2.19 Mike Fedyk
2001-09-16 23:09 ` Lehmann
2001-09-17 1:43 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-17 4:42 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-09-18 11:08 ` Neil Brown
2001-09-18 19:24 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2001-09-19 20:38 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-09-19 22:35 ` Neil Brown
2001-09-21 13:10 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-09-21 22:44 ` Mike Fedyk
2001-10-01 21:17 ` Hans Reiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010918122422.B6861@mikef-linux.matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox