From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:16:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:16:10 -0400 Received: from ns.hobby.nl ([212.72.224.8]:62225 "EHLO hgatenl.hobby.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 16:16:02 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 21:49:04 +0200 From: toon@vdpas.hobby.nl To: Ed Tomlinson Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Whats in the wings for 2.5 (when it opens) Message-ID: <20010918214904.B29648@vdpas.hobby.nl> In-Reply-To: <20010918001826.7D118A0E5@oscar.casa.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010918001826.7D118A0E5@oscar.casa.dyndns.org>; from tomlins@cam.org on Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 08:18:25PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 08:18:25PM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > Hi, > > Seems like there is a lot of code "ready" for consideration in a 2.5 kernel. > I can think of: > > premptable kernel option > user mode kernel > jfs > xfs (maybe) ext3 > rc2 > reverse maping vm > ide driver rewrite > 32bit dma > LTT (maybe) > LVM update to 1.01 My opinion is that the LVM update to 1.01 should go into 2.4 as soon as possible. > ELVM (maybe) > module security stuff > UP friendly SMP scheduler > > What else? > > TIA > Ed Tomlinson Toon.