From: "Ragnar Kjørstad" <kernel@ragnark.vestdata.no>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] multipath RAID personality, 2.4.10-pre9
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 22:59:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010918225952.D5590@vestdata.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010916150806.E1541@turbolinux.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109170113010.3960-100000@localhost.localdomain> <20010918203946.A12814@wyvern>
In-Reply-To: <20010918203946.A12814@wyvern>; from adrian.bridgett@iname.com on Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 08:39:46PM +0100
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 08:39:46PM +0100, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> Do you have plans to change this? I know that the SDD software for AIX load
> balances between paths (and I think EMC's Powerpaths do for AIX too), DMP
> (from Veritas) for Solaris doesn't.
>
> In fact that brings up another point - which path do you use by default? If
> you have the SAN situation where you have a farm of servers each with two FC
> cards two two FC switches and then to two ports on a storage array, you
> don't want everything going to the first switch. Just picking one path to
> use at random would be preferable (unless you want to swap every other
> servers cables around).
I think the multipath driver would benefit from something like the
different modes in the new network bonding driver:
* round robin
* active backup policy
* XOR
(Not sure if XOR would be needed for md?)
I think some other ideas can be stolen from the bonding driver as well,
as the problem is very simular - e.g. the concept of low level drivers
(optionally) delivering status information, so md don't have to try and
fail to detect a link is down, and the timeout settings.
--
Ragnar Kjørstad
Big Storage
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-18 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-14 10:01 [patch] multipath RAID personality, 2.4.10-pre9 Ingo Molnar
2001-09-16 21:08 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-09-16 23:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-09-18 19:39 ` Adrian Bridgett
2001-09-18 20:59 ` Ragnar Kjørstad [this message]
2001-09-18 21:22 ` Brian Beattie
2001-09-24 8:30 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010918225952.D5590@vestdata.no \
--to=kernel@ragnark.vestdata.no \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox