public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: brian@worldcontrol.com
To: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Athlon bug stomper: perf. results
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 13:35:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010919133539.A11184@top.worldcontrol.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9oafeu$1o0$1@penguin.transmeta.com> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0109191141560.24917-100000@anime.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0109191141560.24917-100000@anime.net>

On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:43:48AM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
> AFAIK noone has even tested it yet to see what it does to performance! Eg
> it might slow down memory access so that athlon-optimized memcopy is now
> slower than non-athlon-optimized memcopy. And if it turns out to be the
> case, we might as well just use the non-athlon-optimized memcopy instead
> of twiddling undocumented northbridge bits...

Ok. perhaps this will help:

System: AMD Duron 800Mhz Epox 8KAT3+ MB

I power cycled machine between tests:


Linux 2.4.9ac5 *without* althon bug stomper patch:

    oopes to death on boot.


Linux 2.4.9ac5 with athlon bug stomper patch:

Athlon test program $Id: fast.c,v 1.6 2000/09/23 09:05:45 arjan Exp $ 
clear_page() tests 
clear_page function 'warm up run'        took 19854 cycles per page
clear_page function '2.4 non MMX'        took 11991 cycles per page
clear_page function '2.4 MMX fallback'   took 11857 cycles per page
clear_page function '2.4 MMX version'    took 13666 cycles per page
clear_page function 'faster_clear_page'  took 4853 cycles per page
clear_page function 'even_faster_clear'  took 4819 cycles per page

copy_page() tests 
copy_page function 'warm up run'         took 19638 cycles per page
copy_page function '2.4 non MMX'         took 23855 cycles per page
copy_page function '2.4 MMX fallback'    took 24043 cycles per page
copy_page function '2.4 MMX version'     took 19550 cycles per page
copy_page function 'faster_copy'         took 10909 cycles per page
copy_page function 'even_faster'         took 11333 cycles per page


Linux 2.2.19:

Athlon test program $Id: fast.c,v 1.6 2000/09/23 09:05:45 arjan Exp $ 
clear_page() tests 
clear_page function 'warm up run'        took 14658 cycles per page
clear_page function '2.4 non MMX'        took 13254 cycles per page
clear_page function '2.4 MMX fallback'   took 13099 cycles per page
clear_page function '2.4 MMX version'    took 13005 cycles per page
clear_page function 'faster_clear_page'  took 4913 cycles per page
clear_page function 'even_faster_clear'  took 4887 cycles per page

copy_page() tests 
copy_page function 'warm up run'         took 19664 cycles per page
copy_page function '2.4 non MMX'         took 26431 cycles per page
copy_page function '2.4 MMX fallback'    took 26432 cycles per page
copy_page function '2.4 MMX version'     took 19537 cycles per page
copy_page function 'faster_copy'         took 11564 cycles per page
copy_page function 'even_faster'         took 11467 cycles per page



-- 
Brian Litzinger <brian@worldcontrol.com>

    Copyright (c) 2000 By Brian Litzinger, All Rights Reserved

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-09-19 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-18 14:51 [PATCH] Athlon bug stomper. Pls apply VDA
2001-09-18 15:43 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-20  4:56   ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-09-18 17:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-09-18 21:39 ` Liakakis Kostas
2001-09-19 13:08   ` Re[2]: " VDA
2001-09-19 13:41     ` Liakakis Kostas
2001-09-19 13:47       ` Thomas Langås
2001-09-19 14:31         ` Liakakis Kostas
2001-09-19 14:43           ` Stefan Smietanowski
2001-09-19 14:55           ` Re[2]: " Jan Niehusmann
2001-09-19 14:57             ` Liakakis Kostas
2001-09-19 18:12               ` Alan Cox
2001-09-19 21:18                 ` Re[2]: [PATCH] VIA " Aaron Tiensivu
2001-09-19 23:04                   ` Roberto Jung Drebes
2001-09-19 23:41                     ` Nicholas Knight
2001-09-19 16:00             ` Re[2]: [PATCH] Athlon " Linus Torvalds
2001-09-19 17:15               ` safemode
2001-09-19 18:22                 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2001-09-19 23:41                 ` Re[2]: " Nicholas Knight
2001-09-20 15:10                   ` Marek Mentel
2001-09-19 18:43               ` Dan Hollis
2001-09-19 18:55                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-09-19 19:00                   ` Roberto Jung Drebes
2001-09-19 19:17                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-09-19 20:16                     ` Dan Hollis
2001-09-19 19:50                   ` Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
2001-09-19 20:01                     ` Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
2001-09-19 20:40                       ` Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
2001-09-19 21:43                         ` safemode
2001-09-19 22:22                           ` Brad Pepers
2001-09-19 22:28                             ` Erno Kuusela
2001-09-19 20:36                   ` Simen Thoresen
2001-09-19 20:37                     ` Dan Hollis
2001-09-19 20:51                       ` Simen Thoresen
2001-09-19 23:00                         ` Roberto Jung Drebes
2001-09-19 20:36                   ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-09-19 20:57                     ` Dan Hollis
2001-09-19 21:29                       ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-09-19 23:23                   ` Luigi Genoni
2001-09-20  9:03                   ` VDA
2001-09-19 18:58                 ` Re[2]: " Roberto Jung Drebes
2001-09-19 20:35                 ` brian [this message]
2001-09-19 20:30                   ` Athlon bug stomper: perf. results Dan Hollis
2001-09-19 22:14                     ` brian
2001-09-19 22:08                       ` Dan Hollis
2001-09-21  0:46                 ` Re[2]: [PATCH] Athlon bug stomper. Pls apply Pavel Machek
2001-09-20  0:19               ` Nicholas Knight
2001-09-20  1:27                 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2001-09-20  9:54                 ` Re[2]: " Liakakis Kostas
2001-09-19 23:04             ` Luigi Genoni
2001-09-19 14:05       ` Tom Diehl
2001-09-23 23:33 ` Jan Niehusmann
2001-09-24 15:44   ` bill davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010919133539.A11184@top.worldcontrol.com \
    --to=brian@worldcontrol.com \
    --cc=goemon@anime.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox