From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 15:59:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 15:59:25 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-meridian.redhat.com ([199.183.24.200]:22282 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 15:59:12 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 15:59:34 -0400 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Dan Hollis Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Petr Vandrovec , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Athlon bug stomper. Pls apply. Message-ID: <20010919155934.C17174@devserv.devel.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20010919152121.A9952@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from goemon@anime.net on Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 12:51:07PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 12:51:07PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote: > On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > If it were only 5%, I would vote for disabling the optimisation given the > > number of problems; however it's 2x _and_ you can trigger the bug as normal > > user from userspace too... so we need to fix the hardware/bios. > > But we really dont know what the hell that bit is doing. It might trigger > some other obscure bugs and make things a real mess. > > Until we get some answer from VIA its IMHO a bad idea to start twiddling > this bit willy-nilly on all machines. no argument from me there...