From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolabs.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Mark Swanson <swansma@yahoo.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Request: removal of fs/fs.h/super_block.u to enable partition
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 17:16:43 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010919171643.T14526@turbolinux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BA8F6EC.E3D73C87@yahoo.com> <E15jpH2-0003wz-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E15jpH2-0003wz-00@the-village.bc.nu>
On Sep 19, 2001 22:52 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Apart from the fact that the interface is source level you already can
> distribute, compile and merge file systems without patching the kernel.
>
> It seems to be a user space issue not a kernel one. Your app can amend
> /etc/mtab when it creates and shuts down.
Well, in recent versions of e2fsprogs it prefers to check /proc/mounts
over /etc/mtab to determine if a device is in-use, because the latter
can be incorrect after a crash, and the root filesystem is read-only at
this time. There was recently a bug report about this from Slackware
users, where fsck is run on all of the filesystems before root is
remounted rw. As a result, there is now even extra checking to see if
the devno of the mountpoint == devno of the device, otherwise it assumes
the /etc/mtab entry is bogus.
On most other systems, root is remounted rw before non-root filesystems
are checked, and /etc/mtab could be assumed to be correct, but it will
never be checked if /proc/mounts exists.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto,
\ would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?"
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ -- Dogbert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-19 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-19 2:14 Request: removal of fs/fs.h/super_block.u to enable partition locking Mark Swanson
2001-09-19 6:00 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-09-19 19:28 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-19 19:50 ` Mark Swanson
2001-09-19 21:52 ` Request: removal of fs/fs.h/super_block.u to enable partition Alan Cox
2001-09-19 23:16 ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2001-09-19 23:06 ` Request: removal of fs/fs.h/super_block.u to enable partition locking Andreas Dilger
2001-09-19 20:26 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010919171643.T14526@turbolinux.com \
--to=adilger@turbolabs.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=swansma@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox