public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
To: Petr Vandrovec <VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Athlon bug stomper. Pls apply.
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 22:52:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010919225234.C3775@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EDB9E14576@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz>
In-Reply-To: <3EDB9E14576@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz>; from VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz on Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 09:15:17PM +0000

On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 09:15:17PM +0000, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> On 19 Sep 01 at 19:55, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > 
> > Ok but that part is simple:
> > 
> > run
> > 
> > http://www.fenrus.demon.nl/athlon.c
> 
> Small question - is it OK that 'faster_copy' is faster than
> 'even_faster'? By only few percents, but... It is dual cpu Tyan,
> with two AMD MP 1.2MHz, with 1022:700C AMD hostbridge. I'll
> check KT133 at home if I'll remember...

Same here. In a quite number of cases, even_faster is actually slower.
Not always, though. I suspect the measurement is not really exact.

>                                         Thanks,
>                                                 Petr Vandrovec
>                                                 vandrove@vc.cvut.cz
>                                                 
> 
> Athlon test program $Id: fast.c,v 1.6 2000/09/23 09:05:45 arjan Exp $ 
> clear_page() tests 
> clear_page function 'warm up run'    took 13967 cycles per page
> clear_page function '2.4 non MMX'    took 9298 cycles per page
> clear_page function '2.4 MMX fallback'   took 9284 cycles per page
> clear_page function '2.4 MMX version'    took 8508 cycles per page
> clear_page function 'faster_clear_page'  took 4016 cycles per page
> clear_page function 'even_faster_clear'  took 3916 cycles per page
> 
> copy_page() tests 
> copy_page function 'warm up run'     took 15118 cycles per page
> copy_page function '2.4 non MMX'     took 17002 cycles per page
> copy_page function '2.4 MMX fallback'    took 16978 cycles per page
> copy_page function '2.4 MMX version'     took 15163 cycles per page
> copy_page function 'faster_copy'     took 8569 cycles per page
> copy_page function 'even_faster'     took 8805 cycles per page
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-09-19 20:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-19 21:15 [PATCH] Athlon bug stomper. Pls apply Petr Vandrovec
2001-09-19 19:21 ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-09-19 19:51   ` Dan Hollis
2001-09-19 19:59     ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-09-19 21:44     ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-09-19 22:13       ` Dan Hollis
2001-09-19 22:49         ` John Alvord
2001-09-19 23:14           ` Dan Hollis
2001-09-19 23:32             ` Daniel T. Chen
2001-09-19 22:55         ` Roberto Jung Drebes
2001-09-21 17:22     ` bill davidsen
2001-09-21 19:13       ` Dan Hollis
2001-09-19 20:52 ` Vojtech Pavlik [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-20 13:08 Petr Vandrovec
2001-09-19 23:33 Leif Sawyer
2001-09-19 14:31 Re[2]: " Liakakis Kostas
2001-09-19 14:43 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2001-09-19 13:47 Re[2]: " Thomas Langås
2001-09-19 14:55 ` Jan Niehusmann
2001-09-19 16:00   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-09-19 17:15     ` safemode
2001-09-19 18:22       ` Stefan Smietanowski
2001-09-19 18:43     ` Re[2]: " Dan Hollis
2001-09-19 18:55       ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-09-19 19:00         ` Roberto Jung Drebes
2001-09-19 19:17           ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-09-19 20:16           ` Dan Hollis
2001-09-19 19:50         ` Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
2001-09-19 20:01           ` Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
2001-09-19 20:40             ` Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
2001-09-19 21:43               ` safemode
2001-09-19 22:22                 ` Brad Pepers
2001-09-19 22:28                   ` Erno Kuusela
2001-09-19 20:36         ` Simen Thoresen
2001-09-19 20:37           ` Dan Hollis
2001-09-19 20:51             ` Simen Thoresen
2001-09-19 23:00               ` Roberto Jung Drebes
2001-09-19 20:36         ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-09-19 20:57           ` Dan Hollis
2001-09-19 21:29             ` Vojtech Pavlik
2001-09-19 23:23         ` Luigi Genoni
2001-09-20  9:03         ` VDA
2001-09-20  0:19     ` Re[2]: " Nicholas Knight
2001-09-20  1:27       ` Stefan Smietanowski
2001-09-18 14:51 VDA
2001-09-18 15:43 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-20  4:56   ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-09-18 17:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-09-18 21:39 ` Liakakis Kostas
2001-09-23 23:33 ` Jan Niehusmann
2001-09-24 15:44   ` bill davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010919225234.C3775@suse.cz \
    --to=vojtech@suse.cz \
    --cc=VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz \
    --cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox