From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 20:00:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 20:00:15 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:34698 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 19:59:57 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 16:59:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20010920.165953.102611286.davem@redhat.com> To: acme@conectiva.com.br Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] spin_trylock_bh From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20010915172659.A1916@conectiva.com.br> In-Reply-To: <20010915172659.A1916@conectiva.com.br> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.0 on Emacs 21.0 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 17:26:59 -0300 Please see if this is acceptable, I noticed this while working on the locks for NetBEUI 8) Patch is against 2.4.9, but it should apply to latest prepatch. It was being used in the ppp code for quite some time. This patch looks fine to me... Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com