From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:58:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:58:01 -0400 Received: from mueller.uncooperative.org ([216.254.102.19]:55821 "EHLO mueller.datastacks.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:57:46 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:58:06 -0400 From: Crutcher Dunnavant To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Whats in the wings for 2.5 (when it opens) Message-ID: <20010921155806.B8188@mueller.datastacks.com> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20010918001826.7D118A0E5@oscar.casa.dyndns.org> <20010918214904.B29648@vdpas.hobby.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010918214904.B29648@vdpas.hobby.nl>; from toon@vdpas.hobby.nl on Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 09:49:04PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ++ 18/09/01 21:49 +0200 - toon@vdpas.hobby.nl: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 08:18:25PM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Seems like there is a lot of code "ready" for consideration in a 2.5 kernel. > > I can think of: > > > > premptable kernel option > > user mode kernel > > jfs > > xfs (maybe) > > ext3 > > > rc2 > > reverse maping vm > > ide driver rewrite > > 32bit dma > > LTT (maybe) > > LVM update to 1.01 > > My opinion is that the LVM update to 1.01 should go into 2.4 > as soon as possible. > > > ELVM (maybe) > > module security stuff > > UP friendly SMP scheduler > > > > What else? > > > > TIA > > Ed Tomlinson A cleaner handling of module parameters/cmd line options. -- Crutcher GCS d--- s+:>+:- a-- C++++$ UL++++$ L+++$>++++ !E PS+++ PE Y+ PGP+>++++ R-(+++) !tv(+++) b+(++++) G+ e>++++ h+>++ r* y+>*$