From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 03:28:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 03:28:40 -0400 Received: from [195.223.140.107] ([195.223.140.107]:50418 "EHLO athlon.random") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 03:28:28 -0400 Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 09:28:59 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Benjamin LaHaise Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.10pre13aa1 Message-ID: <20010922092859.N11674@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: <20010921095721.A725@athlon.random> <20010921131841.A15773@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010921131841.A15773@redhat.com>; from bcrl@redhat.com on Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 01:18:41PM -0400 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 01:18:41PM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > the page. If people are truely paranoid, then make it a boot time assertion. What do you think if I replace the mkdirty with a BUG() in case the pte gets marked dirty? Just to be sure no hardware gets it wrong. Andrea