The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Vogel <chris@obelix.hedonism.cx>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Newbie] Interrupt Handling and sleep/wake_up
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 13:19:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010922131916.A1188@emil.frop.org> (raw)

Hi,

-- Warning, newbie qeustion! --

currently I'm trying to write a very simple driver for the NI-GPIB-PCII
card and I'm mostly copying what was linux-gpib a long time ago.

Why am I writing to this list? I think I miss some obvious solution to a
problem. The problem lies within my handling of interrupts, let my try a
simplified example:

The board signals arrival of new data, it's ability to accept new data
or errors via the interrupt. I want my program to sleep until enough
data has been accepted or an error has occured.

Unfortunately on errors the interrupt hits just before I call
sleep_on_timeout() and because it's the only interrupt in this case
that's being generated I have to wait until sleep_on_timeout()
timeout's.

The old driver mostly uses
	while(!condition && !i++>threshold)
		udelay()
which I would like to avoid.

What would be the preferred way of doing this and what am I missing?

Some simple pseudocode follows to illustrate my point: bdIrq
is the interrupt-service-routine, bdDoSomething is called via
device->file-operations->read/write->... and wants to fetch something
from the card or write to it.

void bdIrq(int irq,void *data, struct pt_regs *regs){
	query_board_for_status();
	if( board_has_data_available )
		readbuf[readcounter++]=inb(data_port);
	if( board_can_accept_data )
		outb(wrbuf[writecounter++],data_port);
	if( board_has_error_condition_set )
		board_has_error = 1;
	if( buffer_full_or_end_of_data || board_has_error )
		wake_up_interruptible(&irq_wqueue);
}

void bdDoSomething(){
	setup_buffers_for_interrupt_routing();
	tell_board_to_start_reading_or_writing();
	/***** BOARD THROWS ITS INTERRUPTS HERE!!! *****/
	interruptible_sleep_on_timeout(&irq_wqueue,PCIIA_SLEEP_TIMEOUT);
}

	Chris

-- 
Is it true that cannibals won't eat clowns because they taste funny?

             reply	other threads:[~2001-09-22 11:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-22 11:19 Christian Vogel [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-22 12:26 [Newbie] Interrupt Handling and sleep/wake_up Manfred Spraul
2001-09-22 16:12 ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010922131916.A1188@emil.frop.org \
    --to=chris@obelix.hedonism.cx \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox