From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:57:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:56:50 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:28176 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 12:56:42 -0400 Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 18:56:46 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Alan Cox Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel , "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [patch] block highmem zero bounce v14 Message-ID: <20010922185646.B7304@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20010922183523.A6976@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i X-OS: Linux 2.2.20 i686 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 22 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Yet more evidence that it belongs in 2.5 first. Auditing every scsi driver > > > for that error (and I bet someone had it first and it was copied..) is > > > a big job > > > > Somehow I knew you would say that, Alan. > > I spent a lot of my time debugging driver code, and if its in one driver, > its normally in ten. Look at the last serial driver fixup for example That's true. However, as Arjan pointed out I can fix this up not to rely on drivers working as-is for the new single entry sg behaviour. This is already the case for regular block drivers. Jens