From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 02:28:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 02:28:37 -0400 Received: from codepoet.org ([166.70.14.212]:63039 "HELO winder.codepoet.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 02:28:25 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 00:28:54 -0600 From: Erik Andersen To: David Woodhouse Cc: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux-2.4.10 Message-ID: <20010924002854.A25226@codepoet.org> Reply-To: andersen@codepoet.org Mail-Followup-To: Erik Andersen , David Woodhouse , Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <16995.1001284442@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16995.1001284442@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.9-ac10-rmk1, Rebel-NetWinder(Intel sa110 rev 3), 262.14 BogoMips X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun Sep 23, 2001 at 11:34:02PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > torvalds@transmeta.com said: > > In addition to the VM changes that have gotten so much attention there > > are architecture updates, various major filesystem updates (jffs2 and > > NTFS), > > JFFS2 can't actually be built at the moment because the magic in > fs/Makefile and fs/Config.in appears to be absent. The fix for that is > about number 20 in the patchbomb I'm currently preparing. > > The terminally impatient can find the whole patch, before I finish removing > some of the backward-compatibility crap, at > ftp.uk.linux.org:/pub/people/dwmw2/mtd/mtd-diff-against-2.4.10-v2 Is jffs2 still showing the Child dir "." (ino #1) of dir ino #1 appears to be a hard link problem? I saw you patched mkfs.jffs2 after my changes -- do you still need me to hunt down that bug I added? -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen email: andersee@debian.org, formerly of Lineo --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--