From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 01:45:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 01:45:48 -0400 Received: from sydney4.au.ibm.com ([202.135.142.205]:64526 "EHLO haven.ozlabs.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 01:45:27 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:40:28 +1000 From: Rusty Russell To: Keith Owens Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PART1: Proposed init & module changes for 2.5 Message-Id: <20010924154028.68601c0e.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> In-Reply-To: <5847.1001307249@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <5847.1001307249@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.5.3 (GTK+ 1.2.10; powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:54:09 +1000 Keith Owens wrote: > rmmod > loses race > return OK > module is still in use, user is confused Ah, I see... no, it's currently: rmmod loses race waits for module count to hit zero This can be desirable behavior (rmmod -f). It's not good if you wanted auto-module-unloading, but then, we've never wanted to take the hit to have a pagable kernel, and I don't think we should do so. Cheers, Rusty.