From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 18:40:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 18:40:00 -0400 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([204.152.189.113]:3770 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 18:39:51 -0400 From: Andreas Dilger Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 16:39:49 -0600 To: Andrew Morton Cc: J Troy Piper , lkml Subject: Re: ext3-2.4-0.9.10 Message-ID: <20010924163949.K14526@turbolinux.com> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Morton , J Troy Piper , lkml In-Reply-To: <20010924163546.C244@dok.org> <3BAFABA9.9A8DD1B4@zip.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BAFABA9.9A8DD1B4@zip.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sep 24, 2001 14:54 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Any more progress on my journal_revoke BUG? Strangely enough, I've been > > mounting the drives as ext2 to try and avoid the errors, but I *STILL* hit > > the BUG when untar'ing a large file, or compiling a large file (ie. kernel > > source), which is somewhat unnerving. > > That should have been fixed in 0.9.9???? If the problem happens under ext2 as well, it is not a journal_revoke BUG (or at least it shouldn't be...). Can you post the OOPS output (after running it through ksymoops of course) WHEN RUNNING WITH EXT2. It may be that there is a bug lurking somewhere else also, and you just happen to be lucky enough to find both. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto, \ would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?" http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ -- Dogbert