From: Chris Dukes <pakrat@www.uk.linux.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10 improved reiserfs a lot, but could still be better
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:08:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010924170829.A13630@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010924174745.A8230@emma1.emma.line.org> <E15lYHC-0002zc-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E15lYHC-0002zc-00@the-village.bc.nu>; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 05:08:10PM +0100
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 05:08:10PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Those drives should be blacklisted and rejected as soon as someone tries
> > to mount those pieces rw. Either the drive can make guarantees when a
> > write to permanent storage has COMPLETED (either by switching off the
> > cache or by a flush operation) or it belongs ripped out of the boxes and
> > stuffed down the throat of the idiot who built it.
>
> In which case you can choose between ancient ST-506 drives and SCSI
I thought that Andre had some information as to which devices were
compliant and which weren't.
--
Chris Dukes
The law is a code that isolates justice from public participation.
-- Stephen Marhall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-24 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-24 14:09 [PATCH] 2.4.10 improved reiserfs a lot, but could still be better Beau Kuiper
2001-09-24 14:46 ` [reiserfs-list] " Chris Mason
2001-09-24 15:32 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-24 15:45 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-24 15:47 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-24 16:08 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-24 16:08 ` Chris Dukes [this message]
2001-09-24 16:54 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-24 16:15 ` Nicholas Knight
2001-09-24 16:40 ` [reiserfs-list] " Lehmann
2001-09-24 16:53 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-24 16:57 ` [reiserfs-list] " Lehmann
2001-09-25 14:04 ` bill davidsen
2001-09-25 17:39 ` bill davidsen
2001-09-24 20:05 ` Nicholas Knight
2001-09-25 0:11 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-25 4:49 ` Nicholas Knight
2001-09-25 6:00 ` Beau Kuiper
2001-09-25 6:17 ` Nicholas Knight
2001-09-25 10:44 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-25 11:01 ` ben-lists
2001-09-25 10:42 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-25 11:07 ` Nicholas Knight
2001-09-25 14:47 ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-09-25 15:13 ` Matthias Andree
2001-09-25 15:23 ` John Alvord
2001-09-25 22:41 ` bill davidsen
2001-09-25 12:54 ` Jorge Nerín
2001-09-25 13:06 ` [reiserfs-list] " Chris Mason
2001-09-25 13:17 ` Matthias Andree
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010924170829.A13630@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=pakrat@www.uk.linux.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox