From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 12:06:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 12:06:26 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:49413 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 12:06:18 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 18:06:43 +0200 From: Olaf Hering To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: lkml Subject: Re: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed Message-ID: <20010924180643.A17613@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20010924040208.A624@localhost.localdomain> <20010924175419.A30742@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.16i In-Reply-To: <20010924175419.A30742@suse.de>; from olh@suse.de on Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 05:54:19PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 24, Olaf Hering wrote: > mandarine:~ # vmstat > procs memory swap io system > cpu > r b w swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us > sy id > 3 0 1 0 2744 53944 1794968 0 0 440 343 75 300 14 > 28 58 > mandarine:~ # free > Killed > > > That did not happen with pre10aa1, at least the OOM kills. > I happend with a bk pull, a build in the background. I seems that it > doesnt release some memory... it seems that the cache grows and grows, one bk process was still active. No idea who to blame, but it should not kill the box :) 27429 pts/0 D 3:59 bk idcache -q Gruss Olaf -- $ man clone BUGS Main feature not yet implemented...